# Dgraph Release Candidate v24.0.0-rc1 is now available

**URL:** <https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/dgraph-release-candidate-v24-0-0-rc1-is-now-available/19328>\
**Category:** Announce\
**Tags:** dgraph, release\
**Created:** [May 28, 2024, 9:13pm UTC](https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/dgraph-release-candidate-v24-0-0-rc1-is-now-available/19328 "2024-05-28T21:13:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amaster507](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/discuss.dgraph.io/amaster507/32/4123_2.png) [@amaster507](https://discuss.dgraph.io/u/amaster507)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2024, 8:34pm UTC](https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/dgraph-release-candidate-v24-0-0-rc1-is-now-available/19328/4 "2024-05-29T20:34:23Z")

</div>

Have you looked at my recommendations for optimizing the type system? Replacing dgraph.type under the hood with an edge based type system instead of a predicate based type system?

[https://discuss.hypermode.com/t/ask-dgraph-founder-anything/16352/28?u=amaster507](https://discuss.hypermode.com/t/ask-dgraph-founder-anything/16352/28?u=amaster507)

Also brought up here

> **[RFC: Proposal for change in Type System](https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/rfc-proposal-for-change-in-type-system/17983)**
>
> Proposal. Change Type System from Index based for Node tree based. As an “ontology”. This would allow having a linked T.System. For example. User → Product → purchase. Motivation The Type System today uses the configuration bellow ...

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/dgraph-release-candidate-v24-0-0-rc1-is-now-available/19328)._