This is how the GraphQL spec defines interfaces: interface NamedEntity { name: String } type Person implements NamedEntity { name: String age: Int } Notice how the name field is repeated in the type implementing the interface. Not doing so is an error. In Dgraph, however, we omit the repeat…

Interfaces are not GraphQL compliant

spinelsun (Or Chen) September 16, 2020, 10:29am 13

So currently what is the solution for empty types?
Should I copy the fields from the interface or maybe extract just one field and copy it to each implementation?
Is there an estimated time that this bug will be solved?

Thanks

Correct implementation of an interface

Topic		Replies	Views
Fields on interface fragment not merged with implementing type fieldss GraphQL kind:bug	0	399	July 23, 2021
@id directive and interfaces GraphQL kind:question , status:accepted , ticket:created , area:interface	4	960	November 30, 2020
Implement 2 interfaces GraphQL status:accepted , kind:bug , ticket:created	6	1119	December 8, 2020
In the dgraph schema, if there is an interface that two types implement but both the types have the exact same fields then how to write it? GraphQL kind:question	2	609	April 8, 2021
GraphQL: "Non-nullable field was not present in result" on identically named fields under interface Dgraph dgraph , status:accepted , kind:bug , area:graphql	6	804	August 21, 2020

Interfaces are not GraphQL compliant

Related Topics