Hmm, I wonder if a double pagination would remedy the problem and be the best of both worlds. Pagination before cascade, and pagination after cascade. I am not sure how to easily convey this but maybe a query would look like:
limit being the new suggestion. Then you could add a limit pre the cascade and a pagination post the cascade. This still would not solve all use cases but would be better then iterating over 6M nodes.
To define limit: To limit the galaxy in queries using pagination with cascade.
Yea thats very much like my query I am settling with. Sorta like this:
edit: (to change my wording:) yea that sounds better than what I have to do, which is like the following
and just guess how many you are going to filter out with cascade… which I just have set to the same thing at this point because there is no way for me to guess how much will be filtered.
@matthewmcneely no, I have not - but the issue is a fundamental design decision (to remove all pagination for any query that includes any level of cascade until the end of processing, introduced by this pr) as opposed to a unknown bug.