dmai
(Daniel Mai)
August 23, 2019, 11:14pm
1
Hey folks,
Please try out our latest release candidate v1.1.0-rc2. If you find any issues, please let us know so we can address them before the final v1.1.0.
The full list of changes for v1.1.0 is available in the CHANGELOG . There are LOTS of significant changes and features in this version. They’re all covered in the CHANGELOG, so please take a look and let us know what you think! Dgraph v1.1 is NOT backwards compatible with Dgraph v1.0.
Link to binaries: Linux , Darwin , Windows .
Also published on Docker tagged as v1.1.0-rc2 .
Note: This is not the official release. You won’t be able to get these binaries using the get.dgraph.io quick install script.
$ dgraph version
Dgraph version : v1.1.0-rc2
Dgraph SHA-256 : 1349c2c2e45488073fae5aa39e22ab2d91a74f1f86e85383195ae07d0dca793c
Commit SHA-1 : 9af081d1
Commit timestamp : 2019-08-23 15:41:39 -0700
Branch : HEAD
Go version : go1.12.7
Cheers,
The Dgraph Team
2 Likes
dodyg
(Dody Gunawinata)
August 24, 2019, 6:00am
2
ppp225
(PPP225)
August 24, 2019, 4:14pm
3
When using dgo or ratel:
assigned.Uids["blank-0"]
doesn’t exist, when doing mutation without uid. Dgraph returns uids:<key:"dg.1837703885.759" value:"0x2987" >
When uid is specified during mutation, for example as _:new
, then it works as expected, and can be accessed as assigned.Uids["new"]
.
dmai
(Daniel Mai)
August 28, 2019, 5:40pm
4
@ppp225 dg.1837703885.759
the new format for blank nodes for JSON mutations that don’t explicitly set the "uid"
JSON field.
ppp225
(PPP225)
August 28, 2019, 6:18pm
5
I see. I wondered if this was an intended change, as we can see it still being used in dgo tests
Thanks.
dmai
(Daniel Mai)
August 28, 2019, 6:46pm
6
This was an intended change introduced in this PR:
https://github.com/dgraph-io/dgraph/pull/3795
Thanks for catching that test case in dgo. We updated the rest of them to have explicit uids, and it looks like we missed that one.